How Waterworld Makes Stuntmen Disappear Into The Ocean 🌊🤿
Tayangan
13,5 jt
Suka
201 rb
Kecepatan /j
122 rb
+24j
+3,7 jt
Tayangan dari waktu ke waktu
7 hari terakhir dari snapshot kami.Analitik viralshooter
Hitungan kami atas data YouTube API. Bukan metrik YouTube.
Posisi
- Persentil kecepatan
- 97 / 100
- Persentil kategori
- 99 / 100
- ×base
- ×12
- Tipikal kanal
- 1,1 jt · rata-rata
Dinamika
- Fase
- naik
- Akselerasi
- 1.40×
- Momentum
- ×3.21
- Peluruhan
- 0.05
- Waktu paruh kecepatan
- 4842531h
Interaksi
- Rasio suka
- 1.48%
- Komentar per 1 rb tayangan
- 0.08
- Rasio interaksi
- 1.49%
- Tayangan per subscriber
- 189.97×
- Melintasi batas bahasa
- Tidak
◆ Dihitung oleh viralshooter dari data YouTube API. Bukan metrik YouTube dan tidak didukung oleh YouTube.
Dari catatan YouTube
Bidang video sebagaimana dikembalikan oleh YouTube API.
- Dipublikasikan
- 11 Okt 2026, 10.15
- Durasi
- 0:14
- Kategori
- People & Blogs
- Bahasa audio
- Inggris (en)
- Bahasa judul
- Inggris (en)
- Teks
- Tidak
- Definisi
- HD
- Format
- 2D
- Lisensi
- Standard YouTube
- Konten berlisensi
- Ya
- Dapat disematkan
- Ya
- Dibuat untuk anak
- Tidak
- Dibatasi usia
- Tidak
- Promosi berbayar
- Tidak
- Statistik publik
- Ya
Topik
- Hobby
- Lifestyle
Judul dan deskripsi dalam 1 bahasa
- Inggris
Deskripsi
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.Tampilkan semua
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.
Komentar teratas
@bsb1975
How do you dry the guns before the internal components rust? Do you have to completely disassemble them? This might be one of those times where they use a rubber gun.
♥ 12.526 · 381 balasan
@BigGuwap420
And wash the rain away
♥ 3.405 · 16 balasan
@THEsniffinpup
did anyone else read this as “at Waterworld every swimmer was killed “ or sum along those lines
♥ 2.894 · 24 balasan
@benjaminvolesky1653
The movie was the most expensive for the longest time. Over $100 million spent because of floating set building. The city and oil tanker sets were HUGE.
♥ 1.558 · 3 balasan
@yogisnorthpaw
I went there back in like 98’ or 99’ The only vacation my pops could afford to take us out on. It was so dope we saw in twice in one day. Plus it was hot and the water of the world felt niiiice
♥ 602 · 2 balasan
@ashtar_sheran_jfl
Do they fire blanks or caps
♥ 159 · 13 balasan
@J5productiins
Gosh I always thought they really passed away, so glad someone explained it to me
♥ 81 · 1 balasan
@TheGripReaper42
When he comes out the water it sounds like a duke nukem sfx
♥ 22 · 2 balasan
◆ Dihitung oleh viralshooter · semua angka lainnya dari YouTube API