viralshooter

How Waterworld Makes Stuntmen Disappear Into The Ocean 🌊🤿

ShortPeople & BlogsPublicado el 11 oct 2026

Vistas

13,5 M

Me gusta

201 mil

Velocidad /h

122 mil

+24h

+3,7 M

Vistas a lo largo del tiempo

Últimos 7 días de nuestras capturas.

Análisis de viralshooter

Nuestros cálculos sobre datos de la API de YouTube. No son métricas de YouTube.

Posición

Percentil de velocidad
97 / 100
Percentil de categoría
99 / 100
×base
×12
Habitual del canal
1,1 M · promedio

Dinámica

Fase
en alza
Aceleración
1.40×
Impulso
×3.21
Declive
0.05
Vida media de la velocidad
4842531 d

Interacción

Tasa de me gusta
1.48%
Comentarios por 1 k vistas
0.08
Tasa de interacción
1.49%
Vistas por suscriptor
189.97×
Cruzó una frontera de idioma
No

◆ Calculado por viralshooter a partir de datos de la API de YouTube. No son métricas de YouTube ni cuentan con su aval.

Del registro de YouTube

Campos del video tal como los devuelve la API de YouTube.

Publicado
11 oct 2026, 10:15
Duración
0:14
Categoría
People & Blogs
Idioma del audio
inglés (en)
Idioma del título
inglés (en)
Subtítulos
No
Definición
HD
Formato
2D
Licencia
Standard YouTube
Contenido con licencia
Sí
Se puede insertar
Sí
Hecho para niños
No
Restringido por edad
No
Promoción pagada
No
Estadísticas públicas
Sí

Temas

  • Hobby
  • Lifestyle

Título y descripción en 1 idiomas

  • inglés

Descripción

In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.Mostrar todo

In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.

Comentarios destacados

  • @bsb1975

    How do you dry the guns before the internal components rust? Do you have to completely disassemble them? This might be one of those times where they use a rubber gun.

    ♥ 12.526 · 381 respuestas

  • @BigGuwap420

    And wash the rain away

    ♥ 3405 · 16 respuestas

  • @THEsniffinpup

    did anyone else read this as “at Waterworld every swimmer was killed “ or sum along those lines

    ♥ 2894 · 24 respuestas

  • @benjaminvolesky1653

    The movie was the most expensive for the longest time. Over $100 million spent because of floating set building. The city and oil tanker sets were HUGE.

    ♥ 1558 · 3 respuestas

  • @yogisnorthpaw

    I went there back in like 98’ or 99’ The only vacation my pops could afford to take us out on. It was so dope we saw in twice in one day. Plus it was hot and the water of the world felt niiiice

    ♥ 602 · 2 respuestas

  • @ashtar_sheran_jfl

    Do they fire blanks or caps

    ♥ 159 · 13 respuestas

  • @J5productiins

    Gosh I always thought they really passed away, so glad someone explained it to me

    ♥ 81 · 1 respuestas

  • @TheGripReaper42

    When he comes out the water it sounds like a duke nukem sfx

    ♥ 22 · 2 respuestas

◆ Calculado por viralshooter · el resto de las cifras proviene de la API de YouTube