How Waterworld Makes Stuntmen Disappear Into The Ocean ðð€¿
åçåæ°
1352.6äž
é«è©äŸ¡
20äž
é床 /æ
12äž
+24æé
+367.7äž
åçåæ°ã®æšç§»
ã¹ãããã·ã§ããã®çŽè¿7æ¥éãviralshooteråæ
YouTube APIã®ããŒã¿ãããšã«ããåœãµã€ãç¬èªã®ç®åºã§ããYouTubeã®ææšã§ã¯ãããŸããã
ããžã·ã§ã³
- é床ããŒã»ã³ã¿ã€ã«
- 97 / 100
- ã«ããŽãªããŒã»ã³ã¿ã€ã«
- 99 / 100
- ÃããŒã¹
- Ã12
- ãã£ã³ãã«ã®éåžžå€
- 114.6äž Â· å¹³å
åã
- ãã§ãŒãº
- äžæäž
- å é床
- 1.40Ã
- ã¢ã¡ã³ã¿ã
- Ã3.21
- æžè¡°
- 0.05
- é床ã®åæžæ
- 4842531æ¥
ãšã³ã²ãŒãžã¡ã³ã
- é«è©äŸ¡ç
- 1.48%
- åç1,000åãããã®ã³ã¡ã³ãæ°
- 0.08
- ãšã³ã²ãŒãžã¡ã³ãç
- 1.49%
- ç»é²è 1人ãããã®åçåæ°
- 189.97Ã
- èšèªã®å£ãè¶ãã
- ããã
â YouTube APIã®ããŒã¿ãããšã«viralshooterãç®åºãYouTubeã®ææšã§ã¯ãªããYouTubeãæ¿èªãããã®ã§ããããŸããã
YouTubeã®èšé²ãã
YouTube APIãè¿ãåç»ã®ãã£ãŒã«ãã§ãã
- å ¬éæ¥
- 2026/10/11 10:15
- é·ã
- 0:14
- ã«ããŽãª
- People & Blogs
- é³å£°ã®èšèª
- è±èª (en)
- ã¿ã€ãã«ã®èšèª
- è±èª (en)
- åå¹
- ããã
- ç»è³ª
- HD
- 圢åŒ
- 2D
- ã©ã€ã»ã³ã¹
- Standard YouTube
- ã©ã€ã»ã³ã¹ã³ã³ãã³ã
- ã¯ã
- åã蟌ã¿å¯èœ
- ã¯ã
- åã©ãåã
- ããã
- 幎霢å¶éãã
- ããã
- ææããã¢ãŒã·ã§ã³
- ããã
- çµ±èšã®å ¬é
- ã¯ã
ãããã¯
- Hobby
- Lifestyle
1èšèªã®ã¿ã€ãã«ãšèª¬æ
- è±èª
説æ
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.ãã¹ãŠè¡šç€º
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.
ãããã³ã¡ã³ã
@bsb1975
How do you dry the guns before the internal components rust? Do you have to completely disassemble them? This might be one of those times where they use a rubber gun.
⥠12,526 · è¿ä¿¡381ä»¶
@BigGuwap420
And wash the rain away
⥠3,405 · è¿ä¿¡16ä»¶
@THEsniffinpup
did anyone else read this as âat Waterworld every swimmer was killed â or sum along those lines
⥠2,894 · è¿ä¿¡24ä»¶
@benjaminvolesky1653
The movie was the most expensive for the longest time. Over $100 million spent because of floating set building. The city and oil tanker sets were HUGE.
⥠1,558 · è¿ä¿¡3ä»¶
@yogisnorthpaw
I went there back in like 98â or 99â The only vacation my pops could afford to take us out on. It was so dope we saw in twice in one day. Plus it was hot and the water of the world felt niiiice
⥠602 · è¿ä¿¡2ä»¶
@ashtar_sheran_jfl
Do they fire blanks or caps
⥠159 · è¿ä¿¡13ä»¶
@J5productiins
Gosh I always thought they really passed away, so glad someone explained it to me
⥠81 · è¿ä¿¡1ä»¶
@TheGripReaper42
When he comes out the water it sounds like a duke nukem sfx
⥠22 · è¿ä¿¡2ä»¶
â viralshooterã«ããç®åº · ãã®ä»ã®æ°å€ã¯ãã¹ãŠYouTube APIã«ãããã®