How Waterworld Makes Stuntmen Disappear Into The Ocean 🌊🤿
Vues
13,5 M
J’aime
201 k
Vitesse/h
122 k
+24 h
+3,7 M
Vues dans le temps
Nos relevés des 7 derniers jours.Analyses viralshooter
Nos calculs sur les données de l’API YouTube. Pas des statistiques YouTube.
Position
- Centile de vitesse
- 97 / 100
- Centile de catégorie
- 99 / 100
- ×base
- ×12
- Vues habituelles
- 1,1 M · moyenne
Dynamique
- Phase
- en hausse
- Accélération
- 1.40×
- Élan
- ×3.21
- Déclin
- 0.05
- Demi-vie de la vitesse
- 4842531 j
Engagement
- Taux de j’aime
- 1.48%
- Commentaires par 1 000 vues
- 0.08
- Taux d’engagement
- 1.49%
- Vues par abonné
- 189.97×
- A franchi une frontière linguistique
- Non
◆ Calculé par viralshooter à partir des données de l’API YouTube. Ce ne sont pas des statistiques YouTube, ni approuvées par YouTube.
Selon la fiche YouTube
Les champs de la vidéo tels que l’API YouTube les retourne.
- Publiée
- 11 oct. 2026, 10:15
- Durée
- 0:14
- Catégorie
- People & Blogs
- Langue audio
- anglais (en)
- Langue du titre
- anglais (en)
- Sous-titres
- Non
- Définition
- HD
- Format
- 2D
- Licence
- Standard YouTube
- Contenu sous licence
- Oui
- Intégrable
- Oui
- Conçue pour les enfants
- Non
- Limite d’âge
- Non
- Promotion payée
- Non
- Stats publiques
- Oui
Sujets
- Hobby
- Lifestyle
Titre et description en 1 langues
- anglais
Description
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.Tout afficher
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.
Meilleurs commentaires
@bsb1975
How do you dry the guns before the internal components rust? Do you have to completely disassemble them? This might be one of those times where they use a rubber gun.
♥ 12 526 · 381 réponses
@BigGuwap420
And wash the rain away
♥ 3 405 · 16 réponses
@THEsniffinpup
did anyone else read this as “at Waterworld every swimmer was killed “ or sum along those lines
♥ 2 894 · 24 réponses
@benjaminvolesky1653
The movie was the most expensive for the longest time. Over $100 million spent because of floating set building. The city and oil tanker sets were HUGE.
♥ 1 558 · 3 réponses
@yogisnorthpaw
I went there back in like 98’ or 99’ The only vacation my pops could afford to take us out on. It was so dope we saw in twice in one day. Plus it was hot and the water of the world felt niiiice
♥ 602 · 2 réponses
@ashtar_sheran_jfl
Do they fire blanks or caps
♥ 159 · 13 réponses
@J5productiins
Gosh I always thought they really passed away, so glad someone explained it to me
♥ 81 · 1 réponses
@TheGripReaper42
When he comes out the water it sounds like a duke nukem sfx
♥ 22 · 2 réponses
◆ Calculé par viralshooter · tous les autres chiffres viennent de l’API YouTube