viralshooter

How Waterworld Makes Stuntmen Disappear Into The Ocean 🌊🤿

CourtePeople & BlogsPubliée le 11 oct. 2026

Vues

13,5 M

J’aime

201 k

Vitesse/h

122 k

+24 h

+3,7 M

Vues dans le temps

Nos relevés des 7 derniers jours.

Analyses viralshooter

Nos calculs sur les données de l’API YouTube. Pas des statistiques YouTube.

Position

Centile de vitesse
97 / 100
Centile de catégorie
99 / 100
×base
×12
Vues habituelles
1,1 M · moyenne

Dynamique

Phase
en hausse
Accélération
1.40×
Élan
×3.21
Déclin
0.05
Demi-vie de la vitesse
4842531 j

Engagement

Taux de j’aime
1.48%
Commentaires par 1 000 vues
0.08
Taux d’engagement
1.49%
Vues par abonné
189.97×
A franchi une frontière linguistique
Non

◆ Calculé par viralshooter à partir des données de l’API YouTube. Ce ne sont pas des statistiques YouTube, ni approuvées par YouTube.

Selon la fiche YouTube

Les champs de la vidéo tels que l’API YouTube les retourne.

Publiée
11 oct. 2026, 10:15
Durée
0:14
Catégorie
People & Blogs
Langue audio
anglais (en)
Langue du titre
anglais (en)
Sous-titres
Non
Définition
HD
Format
2D
Licence
Standard YouTube
Contenu sous licence
Oui
Intégrable
Oui
Conçue pour les enfants
Non
Limite d’âge
Non
Promotion payée
Non
Stats publiques
Oui

Sujets

  • Hobby
  • Lifestyle

Titre et description en 1 langues

  • anglais

Description

In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.Tout afficher

In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.

Meilleurs commentaires

  • @bsb1975

    How do you dry the guns before the internal components rust? Do you have to completely disassemble them? This might be one of those times where they use a rubber gun.

    ♥ 12 526 · 381 réponses

  • @BigGuwap420

    And wash the rain away

    ♥ 3 405 · 16 réponses

  • @THEsniffinpup

    did anyone else read this as “at Waterworld every swimmer was killed “ or sum along those lines

    ♥ 2 894 · 24 réponses

  • @benjaminvolesky1653

    The movie was the most expensive for the longest time. Over $100 million spent because of floating set building. The city and oil tanker sets were HUGE.

    ♥ 1 558 · 3 réponses

  • @yogisnorthpaw

    I went there back in like 98’ or 99’ The only vacation my pops could afford to take us out on. It was so dope we saw in twice in one day. Plus it was hot and the water of the world felt niiiice

    ♥ 602 · 2 réponses

  • @ashtar_sheran_jfl

    Do they fire blanks or caps

    ♥ 159 · 13 réponses

  • @J5productiins

    Gosh I always thought they really passed away, so glad someone explained it to me

    ♥ 81 · 1 réponses

  • @TheGripReaper42

    When he comes out the water it sounds like a duke nukem sfx

    ♥ 22 · 2 réponses

◆ Calculé par viralshooter · tous les autres chiffres viennent de l’API YouTube