How Waterworld Makes Stuntmen Disappear Into The Ocean ๐๐คฟ
์กฐํ์
1352.6๋ง
์ข์์
20๋ง
์๊ฐ๋น ์๋
12๋ง
+24์๊ฐ
+367.7๋ง
์กฐํ์ ์ถ์ด
์ต๊ทผ 7์ผ๊ฐ์ ์ค๋ ์ท์ ๋๋ค.viralshooter ๋ถ์
YouTube API ๋ฐ์ดํฐ๋ก ๊ณ์ฐํ ์์ฒด ์งํ์ ๋๋ค. YouTube ์งํ๊ฐ ์๋๋๋ค.
์์น
- ์๋ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ์
- 97 / 100
- ์นดํ ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ์
- 99 / 100
- ร๊ธฐ์ค
- ร12
- ์ฑ๋ ํ์ ์กฐํ์
- 114.6๋ง ยท ํ๊ท
ํ๋ฆ
- ๋จ๊ณ
- ์์น
- ๊ฐ์๋
- 1.40ร
- ๋ชจ๋ฉํ
- ร3.21
- ๊ฐ์
- 0.05
- ์๋ ๋ฐ๊ฐ๊ธฐ
- 4842531์ผ
์ฐธ์ฌ๋
- ์ข์์์จ
- 1.48%
- ์กฐํ์ 1์ฒ๋น ๋๊ธ
- 0.08
- ์ฐธ์ฌ์จ
- 1.49%
- ๊ตฌ๋ ์๋น ์กฐํ์
- 189.97ร
- ์ธ์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณ๋ฅผ ๋์
- ์๋์
โ YouTube API ๋ฐ์ดํฐ๋ก viralshooter๊ฐ ๊ณ์ฐํ์ต๋๋ค. YouTube ์งํ๊ฐ ์๋๋ฉฐ YouTube๊ฐ ๋ณด์ฆํ์ง ์์ต๋๋ค.
YouTube ๋ ์ฝ๋
YouTube API๊ฐ ๋ฐํํ ๊ทธ๋๋ก์ ๋์์ ์ ๋ณด์ ๋๋ค.
- ๊ฒ์์ผ
- 2026. 10. 11. ์ค์ 10:15
- ๊ธธ์ด
- 0:14
- ์นดํ ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ
- People & Blogs
- ์ค๋์ค ์ธ์ด
- ์์ด (en)
- ์ ๋ชฉ ์ธ์ด
- ์์ด (en)
- ์๋ง
- ์๋์
- ํ์ง
- HD
- ํ์
- 2D
- ๋ผ์ด์ ์ค
- Standard YouTube
- ๋ผ์ด์ ์ค ์ฝํ ์ธ
- ์
- ํผ๊ฐ๊ธฐ ํ์ฉ
- ์
- ์๋์ฉ
- ์๋์
- ์ฐ๋ น ์ ํ
- ์๋์
- ์ ๋ฃ ํ๋ก๋ชจ์
- ์๋์
- ๊ณต๊ฐ ํต๊ณ
- ์
์ฃผ์
- Hobby
- Lifestyle
1๊ฐ ์ธ์ด๋ก ์ ๊ณต๋๋ ์ ๋ชฉ๊ณผ ์ค๋ช
- ์์ด
์ค๋ช
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.๋ชจ๋ ๋ณด๊ธฐ
In the mid-1990s, off the coast of Kawaihae, Hawaii, Universal Pictures built one of the most ambitious and troubled productions in Hollywood history: Waterworld, a post-apocalyptic epic staged largely on a vast floating atoll that weighed roughly a thousand tons and was anchored in open ocean. Filming on water posed a peculiar choreographic problem, because every raider shot, speared, or blasted off the walls during the battle sequences still had to disappear convincingly once the cameras captured the fall. A popular story later held that these "killed" stunt performers escaped through hidden underwater chambers built beneath the set, but production accounts do not support so tidy a legend. The reality was more improvised and more dangerous: performers hit the water, swam clear of the frame or ducked beneath the structure's edges, and relied on safety divers, support boats, and carefully timed camera angles to complete the illusion while battling currents, swells, and fatigue. Those demands contributed to a shoot plagued by storms, a sunken set, seasickness, and spiraling costs that pushed the budget past 175 million dollars, then the highest ever recorded. The enduring myth of secret chambers revealed how audiences preferred an elegant trick to the grueling truth, and Waterworld became a cautionary lesson in how ocean-bound filmmaking punished ambition and, in time, accelerated the industry's turn toward controlled tanks and digital water. This video is intended solely for educational and historical analysis. It does not support, promote, or glorify war or any form of hatred. Its purpose is to present verified historical facts and encourage critical understanding of past events.
์ธ๊ธฐ ๋๊ธ
@bsb1975
How do you dry the guns before the internal components rust? Do you have to completely disassemble them? This might be one of those times where they use a rubber gun.
โฅ 12,526 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 381๊ฐ
@BigGuwap420
And wash the rain away
โฅ 3,405 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 16๊ฐ
@THEsniffinpup
did anyone else read this as โat Waterworld every swimmer was killed โ or sum along those lines
โฅ 2,894 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 24๊ฐ
@benjaminvolesky1653
The movie was the most expensive for the longest time. Over $100 million spent because of floating set building. The city and oil tanker sets were HUGE.
โฅ 1,558 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 3๊ฐ
@yogisnorthpaw
I went there back in like 98โ or 99โ The only vacation my pops could afford to take us out on. It was so dope we saw in twice in one day. Plus it was hot and the water of the world felt niiiice
โฅ 602 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 2๊ฐ
@ashtar_sheran_jfl
Do they fire blanks or caps
โฅ 159 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 13๊ฐ
@J5productiins
Gosh I always thought they really passed away, so glad someone explained it to me
โฅ 81 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 1๊ฐ
@TheGripReaper42
When he comes out the water it sounds like a duke nukem sfx
โฅ 22 ยท ๋ต๊ธ 2๊ฐ
โ viralshooter ๊ณ์ฐ๊ฐ ยท ๋๋จธ์ง ์์น๋ YouTube API